This tells us that the answer to this question shouldnt involve anor,but rather, anand.
Understanding the Difference
First, lets quantify our terms.
Too many people think Weaver stance simply describes any manner of shooting a handgun with both hands.
In fact, its a very specific, isometric-based shooting stance.
In between those two is the Chapman stance, whose namesake originator dubbed it amodified Weaver stance.
This is particularly true with multiple and/or moving targets.
Each of the shooting stances has different dynamics going on with it.
Accordingly, each has specific strengths, but also specific weaknesses.
Well discuss those in more detail as this four-part series continues.
There is a time for the cross and the hook, for the jab and the uppercut.
What is the given practitioners range of movement?
What is their level of physical strength?
My wife, a state and regional shooting champion, prefers Isosceles.
We are seat-belted in place, and for whatever reason unable to drive away.
Well also look at subtle options and adaptations which their users have developed over the years.
