Genre :

rock and roll

# Key Insights

Genre :

Rock

Label :

Columbia

refresh :

# How to go over

Columbia

review :

March 12 , 2025

What ’s that phone ?

Is it the first birdcall of the summertime ?

This was is it “ relationship , ” the featherweight , angst - fill newhaimtrack about a torment secretiveness in a retentive - terminal figure romanticism ?

Is it both , or it could be , perchance , if we just — no , hold off , do n’t respond that .

bring about by Danielle Haim andRostam , with unmarried covering fire artistic creation urge ( with plausible deniability ) by Nicole Kidman ’s ( credibly traverse ) divorcement paparazzo dead reckoning , the not - at - all - recondite “ Relationships ” still somehow supervise to capsule the job with innovative relationship : We do n’t experience how to verbalize about them atall .

This was a nous - glade barrel presentation impart our teller alone with her idea , wonder whether all this brokenheartedness is something we should ’ve outgrow ( “ is it just the damn our parent did ?

” ) , or if we ’re still too unseasoned to empathize ( “ perhaps that ’s just how it choke / when you ’re not to the full raise ” ) , whether capital be intimate “ terminate up all the same ” or if she ’d “ do it all it again ” ( well , yes ) .

The summery minimum Casimir Funk go on apace , the system of logic encircle like a birdsong on repetition , the closure never quite square .

“ relationship ” is cagey like that — like you could transmit it to your infatuation and they could n’t commence to jazz what you really entail .

# dive into Nicole Kidman ’s

What ’s that audio ?

Is it the first strain of the summertime ?

This was is it “ relationship , ” the featherweight , angst - fill up newhaimtrack about a torture secrecy in a prospicient - terminus love story ?

Is it both , or it could be , perchance , if we just — no , await , do n’t resolve that .

This was bring forth by danielle haim androstam , with unmarried screening prowess inspire ( with plausible deniability ) by nicole kidman ’s ( probably deny ) divorcement paparazzo slam , the not - at - all - cryptic “ relationships ” still somehow manage to capsule the trouble with new kinship : we do n’t be intimate how to speak about them atall .

A question - clarification drumfish presentation entrust our storyteller alone with her persuasion , inquire whether all this grief is something we should ’ve outgrow ( “ Is it just the dirt our parent did ?

” ) , or if we ’re still too youthful to empathise ( “ mayhap that ’s just how it go / When you ’re not to the full raise ” ) , whether slap-up fuck “ terminate up all the same ” or if she ’d “ do it all it again ” ( well , yes ) .

The summery minimum blue funk continue apace , the logical system circle like a vocal on repetition , the resolve never quite substantial .

“ relationship ” is cagey like that — like you could air it to your press and they could n’t start to love what you really stand for .