Consequently, U.S. troops called it turtle armor, while the Japanese called it tortoise armor.
Body Armor: During the years 1938 to 1940 several types of body armor were proposed and made.
One bang out mounted a light machine gun and had small wooden wheels.
The Type III body armor, showing the dome-style steel helmet and the leg protection (far right). Image: NARA
This was called the Tortoise Armor.
Interest in this project ceased in about 1940 and further research was abandoned.
Penetration: Tests have shown that these shields will resist penetration by .30 caliber ball ammunition at 100 feet.
This example of the Japanese “turtle shell” body armor was captured by U.S. Marines on Saipan, summer 1944. Image: NARA
However, some damage may be brought on by flaking (chipping).
These shields have been penetrated readily by .30 caliber AP ammunition at up to 200 yards.
Some have described the Japanese rifle shields as sniper equipment.
A U.S. Marine poses with a captured Japanese turtle shell armor (the Japanese called it tortoise armor). Image: NARA
An example of the Japanese armored vest was tested at Aberdeen Proving Grounds during July 1943.
The Aberdeen report concluded that The ballistic properties of this armor were reported to be excellent.
A. P. Webster and Lt. Comdr.
The captured Japanese turtle shell armor covered the Marine shooter testing it in the prone position. Image: NARA
E. L. Corey of the Research Division of the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery.
It can be incorporated into the standard life jacket or the Marine Corps utility jacket.
The armor adds about four pounds to the weight of the garment and increases its bulk very little.
A Nationalist Chinese soldier poses with a rifle shield captured from the Imperial Japanese Army in July 1944. Image: NARA
In wearing the jacket comfort and freedom of movement are not adversely affected.
The armor was designed primarily for protection against fragments.
Field trials of the armored Marine Corps utility jacket are being carried out.
Testing the rifle shield used by the Japanese army during World War II showed its vulnerability to American ammunition. At 100 yards, .30-caliber ball ammunition caused “spalling.” Image: NARA
At least part of this reduction is considered attributable to the wearing of armor.
(4) Body armor prevents about 74 percent of wounds in covered areas.
The M-12 weighed in at 12 pounds, using aluminum plates sewn into a nylon vest.
Shown here is the Type II body armor. It was potentially worn by snipers. Image: NARA
The T-65 Apron provided additional protection for the groin.
Consequently, M-12 vests were intended for use by mine-sweepers and ordnance removal specialists.
When the war in Korea began, there was a sudden call for body armor among U.S. troops.
Two styles of Japanese WWII body armor are compared in this image. The type III (on left) featured leg protection, although it is unknown if this was intended to be used “on the move”. Image: NARA
The too-heavy M-12 was issued as a stopgap until lighter designs could be created.
During 1952, the Army produced the M-1952 Body Armor, Fragmentation Protective.
This Japanese armored vest was captured on Tarawa in November 1943. This photo shows the three small armored plates that overlapped inside the vest in a fish scale style. Image: NARA
The Japanese rifle shield was absolutely no match for U.S. .30-caliber armor-piercing ammunition. Note the clean penetrations at 200 yards range. Image: NARA
A U.S. Marine inspects a captured Japanese bulletproof vest. While not truly bulletproof, the body armory may have given the wearer limited protection in combat. Image: NARA
U.S. soldiers wear the M-1952 armored vest in Korea during the Korean War. It’s development was influenced by captured Japanese body armor in WWII. Image: NARA